The Commission found that Intel engaged in two specific forms of
illegal practice. First, Intel gave wholly or partially hidden rebates to
computer manufacturers on condition that they bought all, or almost all, their
x86 CPUs from Intel. Intel also made direct payments to a major retailer on
condition it stock only computers with Intel x86 CPUs. Such rebates and payments
effectively prevented customers - and ultimately consumers - from choosing
alternative products. Second, Intel made direct payments to computer
manufacturers to halt or delay the launch of specific products containing
competitors’ x86 CPUs and to limit the sales channels available to these
products.
1More
5 low-cost tricks for keeping up with new technologies | InfoWorld - 0 views
1More
5 Best Linux Distros for Security - Datamation - 0 views
2More
5 Linux Laptops for Small Business - 0 views
Project Summary - 1 views
2More
5 Best Open Source Web Browser Security Apps - 0 views
1More
5 signs your Web application has been hacked | ITworld - 0 views
1More
5 reasons Microsoft may never give up on Linux patent claims | CIO - 0 views
1More
Facebook to Pay $550 Million to Settle Facial Recognition Suit - The New York Times - 2 views
9More
Hey ITU Member States: No More Secrecy, Release the Treaty Proposals | Electronic Front... - 0 views
6More
NSA contractors use LinkedIn profiles to cash in on national security | Al Jazeera America - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
41 - 60 of 81
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page